The September 2016 Alliance breakfast club, kindly hosted by Charities Aid Foundation, focused on the influence of philanthropy, and what limits, if any, should be imposed. The discussion was rooted in Alliance magazine’s September 2016 special feature: ‘Does philanthropy have too much influence?’ Here, a participant in that discussion, Eugenie Harvey, offers her thoughts.
Alliance’s September issue made thought-provoking reading, as did the Alliance breakfast club meeting hosted by CAF. Of the many and varied contributions to the subject, most if not all made the point that philanthropy’s influence is most effectively and transparently exerted through support for civil society rather than seeking to shape public policy directly. As Joanne Florino puts it, civil society’s essence as a ‘polyarchy’ – a society in which there are many independent sources of power – tempers philanthropy’s influence through the diverse and dynamic ecosystem in which it operates.
Often the issue is ‘locally unpopular’ – for example, support for the Bulgarian LGBTI community, improved access to education for Roma children, and increasingly, the treatment of refugees – but so much the better for a group of philanthropists seeking long-term systemic social change.
This view is almost certainly shared by our 200-plus members and 5,000-plus donors whose philanthropic giving is facilitated through our live crowdfunding events in cities in the UK and Ireland, across Central and Eastern Europe (Bulgaria, Romania, Serbia, Turkey, Hungary, Slovakia and Poland) as well as in Australia, New Zealand, South Africa, Canada and the US.