The Black feminists that broke philanthropy’s inaction in Sudan

 

Hakima Abbas

0

It’s been six months. Six months since country-wide violence has resulted in the deaths of thousands, and many more displaced and injured. It’s been six months since the Sudanese people have been caught between two armies led by men that nobody wants in power.

When war starts, infrastructure collapses.

People are dying not only of bullets, but of preventable disease because most hospitals are inoperable. They are dying from hunger and thirst because they are trapped in their houses – , unless their houses have been occupied by the men with guns. Banks are closed, fuel is gold, transportation is elusive and safety is distant. Ethnic cleansing continues in Al Geneina and elsewhere. The harm of this war only immediate, and it will be felt for decades in the loss of cultural archives, in the destruction of infrastructure, and in the psychological impact on the people. 

Four years ago, the people of Sudan showed their tenacity and bravery by deposing a long-held dictatorship. In this moment of hope and glory, they were celebrated – in the media, in activist circles, and in philanthropy. The historic moment of people’s power in action was widely iconized, even among those who know very little about the history of the country and its people. During the 2019 uprisings, Sudanese people, especially young people and women, formed decentralized committees that took up the charge of amplifying the demands of the people even when the international community preferred to legitimize the wrangling of military men and their proxies. 

While this ‘civil society’ continues to be active, philanthropy has not. The racialized and gendered biases of philanthropy are on display in full force. The Sudanese people are being largely ignored by philanthropy because philanthropy normalizes Africa as a continent of war and disease. African deaths matter less

Since the war began it has been the revolutionary and neighborhood committees and other peoples’ efforts in Sudan and bordering countries that are ensuring safe passage for Sudanese and foreign civilians, building hospitals in the rubble, and attempting to meet the needs of the people. Feminists, women, LGBTIQ and other people have organized at home, through social media and in the diaspora. Regional Black feminist groups like the Strategic Initiative for the Horn of Africa (SIHA) have gotten hundreds of people to safety and supplied life-saving supplies to hundreds of households in Sudan.

SIHA also continues to amplify the demands of Sudanese women’s rights groups in their membership. Groups in Egypt, that need to remain anonymous for security reasons, have provided first-call humanitarian assistance to families fleeing the conflict while others have provided support to LGBTIQ people. These are just examples. Newly formed and established groups in Chad, Egypt, Ethiopia, Kenya, Central African Republic, South Sudan, and in Sudan itself are organizing to meet collective needs, raising autonomous resources to do so. 

While this ‘civil society’ continues to be active, philanthropy has not. The racialized and gendered biases of philanthropy are on display in full force. The Sudanese people are being largely ignored by philanthropy because philanthropy normalizes Africa as a continent of war and disease. African deaths matter less. Our countries are barely understood as such. And yet the international community hides their vested interests in our resources. These vested interests make the war in Sudan a powder keg with the possibility of exploding into a full-blown proxy war among many global actors – including Russia and the U.S. On June 19th, donor countries pledged $1.5bn for the UN’s crisis response in Sudan, more than $1billion short of the required $2.57 billion needed to meet the humanitarian needs. Yet still, entirely missing is the support for social movements and grassroots efforts that are needed for transformative sustained people-led change. 

Funders can take the lead from the response by feminist funds, Urgent Action Fund – Africa (UAF-A) for example. UAF-Africa’s response to the Sudan crisis is grounded in the principles of intersectional feminist response to crises which is movement informed

Witnessing the inertia of philanthropy, the Black Feminists in Philanthropy network mobilized members into ‘Black feminist action on Sudan’ and invited Sudanese feminists to join. Over the last months, this group of Black feminists have raised US$500,000 in new funding for Sudanese feminist groups, which is being dispersed as I write. Another US$500,000 has been committed. The urgent need is for money to flow to grassroots efforts that are meeting immediate needs of those who have fled and those who remain in the country. The longer term need is to support Sudanese movements inside Sudan, in neighboring countries and in the broader diaspora to continue to meet these needs and to build power to ensure that the demands of the people are at the center of any negotiations or processes, and at the forefront of rebuilding the country. After all, that is what was being demanded from the start – a truly democratic Sudan for all its people. 

Funders can take the lead from the response by feminist funds, Urgent Action Fund – Africa (UAF-A) for example. UAF-Africa’s response to the Sudan crisis is grounded in the principles of intersectional feminist response to crises which is movement informed. They have made over $100,000 in the last few months to Sudan in rapid response grants for movement strategy spaces, safety, relocation, medical services, documentation, strategic communication, stakeholder engagement, awareness raising, and psycho-social support while simultaneously engaging with local movements for lasting change. They have supported innovative enhancements by their grantees including creating safe spaces and peace negotiations through women’s cooperative groups for example.

The hope lies in the people’s efforts and the possibility still of philanthropy to respond adequately. Black Feminist Action on Sudan is calling on philanthropy to break the inertia, to match and surpass the million dollars raised for Sudanese feminist initiatives. 

Hakima Abbas is the Co-Founder of The Black Feminist Fund 


Comments (0)

Peter Korkeley

I think that is a brilliant innovation project to invest in disadvantaged marginalized groups both in the USA and in Africa. Sudan is a socially and economically broken country, uncertainty recovery continues to hamper the country due to insecurity. The African Indigenous tribes such as Nuba, Beja, and other indigenous tribes in Sudan have been undermined for decades until this day, which is why civil wars have continued from 1956 until 1972 and again from 1983 until 2005-2011 and South Sudan separated from Northern Sudan. And again in 2011 Nuba Mountains, Blue Nile, and Darfur, Eastern, Country civil wars are still ongoing. Again on the 15th of April 2023, conflict erupted in Khartoum and escalated to other states making the worst scenario for the country Sudan not easy to recover from its internal political and social injustice gervancies. Nuba and Funj Regions have been closed since 2011 humanitarian intervention has not allowed until now to access these most marginalized indigenous tribes of Sudan upto date, I hope the global Black Feminist Action philanthropy on Sudan can break-through such bearers' by creating opportunities for feminist initiatives into these inclosed regions for a long time, match and surpass the million dollars raised for Sudanese feminist initiatives.


Sona

Consider setting up a Black Feminist crowdfunder.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *