International grassroots organizations are underfunded and yet are one of the most important and effective tools in the environmental movement.
A recent report by the National Committee for Responsive Philanthropy, Cultivating the Grassroots: A winning approach for environment and climate funders, re-affirms the important role that grassroots organizations have played in protecting the environment, especially in communities most at risk of pollution that poses serious risks to human health and safety. The report, written by Sarah Hansen, documents the success of grassroots organizations in fighting for the health and safety of their communities and, in the process, building support for changes in state and federal policies to protect the environment. Despite the success of community-led campaigns to protect the environment, the report indicates that from 2007 to 2009 only 15% of environmental grant dollars benefitted marginalized communities and only 11% supported community-based organizing and policy efforts.
During my nearly 25 years at the Public Welfare Foundation we focused our Environment Program’s support on the grassroots environmental justice movement, both in the United States and around the world. Our early and continued support for community struggles against polluters supported efforts to bring attention to and action on a broad range of issues, including oil company pollution in Ecuador and Nigeria, the destruction of Appalachian communities by strip mining and mountain-top removal operations, and the long-term human health effects of nuclear weapons development in communities across the country. In each case, we supported both local campaigns and state and national policy advocacy efforts that were guided by those campaigns. And in each case, our support was provided on a long-term basis, understanding that serious environmental problems cannot be solved in the often arbitrary timelines imposed by funding cycles.
Grassroots organizations combine local knowledge and motivated engagement. They can identify needs of the community and find solutions to problems that are adapted to their own circumstances. As each situation is different from the next, we cannot provide a single practice or tool that will provide a solution for each. In three years on the board of directors of Global Greengrants Fund, I have seen many examples that have reaffirmed that this is especially true for international work. What works for a village in West Africa may not be useful for a town in Central Asia. Local communities also have the motivation to see their cause through to a solution. Who better to lead a cause then those that will benefit the most from change?
The NCRP report offers valuable guidance to funders who are committed to solving serious environmental problems and supporting the voices of marginalized people who are often most effected by those problems.
Larry Kressley is a member of the board of directors of Global Greengrants Fund
I cannot agree more with Larry. His is a master piece of an analysis, which if taken seriously we would see more of effective environmental issues being tackled at grassroot levels. For sure there is more being done by these grassroot organizations than the money guzzling big organizations. These have to contend with large salary bills, vehicle costs and many other overheads which take a large portion of the donor aid. In actual fact the issues they purport to be addressing are actual worsened by some of these big organizations. A point in case is that we run an environmental organization and we got two seed funds in 2011. We have done a lot with less than ten thousand dollars that we got, compared to two organizations that are well established doing similar work. I wish for sure if more could be channeled towards small organizations like ours we could be more effective unlike these big organizations who spread all over with very little effect on the ground.